1996 Fiat Scudo vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1996 Fiat Scudo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Fiat Scudo (78 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Scudo should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 99 kg more than 1996 Fiat Scudo.
Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Scudo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Scudo. (125 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Scudo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Scudo | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Scudo | EJ |
Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1579 cc | 2262 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 1400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1740 mm |