1996 Fiat Scudo vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1996 Fiat Scudo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1974 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (119 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Scudo. (78 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Scudo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Fiat Scudo weights approximately 75 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1974 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Scudo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Fiat Scudo. (125 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1974 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Fiat Scudo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Scudo | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Scudo | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1579 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 78 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 125 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1590 mm |