1996 Fiat Vivace vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1996 Fiat Vivace is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena (116 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1996 Fiat Vivace. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1996 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 234 kg more than 1996 Fiat Vivace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Fiat Vivace | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Fiat | Matra-Simca |
Model | Vivace | Murena |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2440 mm |