1996 Fiat Vivace vs. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV
To start off, 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Fiat Vivace would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV weights approximately 354 kg more than 1996 Fiat Vivace.
Because 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Fiat Vivace | 2012 Mitsubishi i-MiEV | |
| Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Vivace | i-MiEV |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 816 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3678 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1585 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1615 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2550 mm |
