1996 Ford Aerostar vs. 1958 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1996 Ford Aerostar is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1958 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1958 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Aerostar | 1958 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Ford | Ford |
| Model | Aerostar | 12 M |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1170 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2500 mm |
