1996 Ford Aerostar vs. 1988 Acura Integra
To start off, 1996 Ford Aerostar is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1988 Acura Integra. (125 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1988 Acura Integra.
Because 1996 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Acura Integra. (139 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Aerostar | 1988 Acura Integra | |
Make | Ford | Acura |
Model | Aerostar | Integra |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 125 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4285 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2450 mm |