1996 Ford Aerostar vs. 1989 Jaguar XJS

To start off, 1996 Ford Aerostar is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 1989 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Jaguar XJS (235 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 235 kg more than 1996 Ford Aerostar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Jaguar XJS (387 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1989 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Aerostar.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Ford Aerostar 1989 Jaguar XJS
Make Ford Jaguar
Model Aerostar XJS
Year Released 1996 1989
Body Type Minivan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2979 cc 3980 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 235 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 4750 RPM
Torque 217 Nm 387 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3750 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1515 kg 1750 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1270 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2600 mm