1996 Ford Aerostar vs. 1993 Toyota Cressida

To start off, 1996 Ford Aerostar is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Toyota Cressida. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Toyota Cressida would be higher. At 2,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Toyota Cressida (217 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Toyota Cressida should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 95 kg more than 1993 Toyota Cressida.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Toyota Cressida (279 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1993 Toyota Cressida will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Aerostar.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Ford Aerostar 1993 Toyota Cressida
Make Ford Toyota
Model Aerostar Cressida
Year Released 1996 1993
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2979 cc 2997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 217 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 217 Nm 279 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4800 RPM
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1515 kg 1420 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4760 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2740 mm