1996 Ford Aerostar vs. 2000 Honda J-VX
To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2000 Honda J-VX. (104 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2000 Honda J-VX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 50 kg more than 2000 Honda J-VX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Honda J-VX. (144 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Honda J-VX.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Aerostar | 2000 Honda J-VX | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Aerostar | J-VX |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 999 cc |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1465 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2720 mm |