1996 Ford Aerostar vs. 2002 Volvo S60

To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Aerostar (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2002 Volvo S60. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2002 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 45 kg more than 2002 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo S60 (285 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Aerostar.

Compare all specifications: