1996 Ford Aerostar vs. 2011 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2011 Chrysler 200 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chrysler 200 (283 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Aerostar.
Because 1996 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chrysler 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2011 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Aerostar | 2011 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Ford | Chrysler |
Model | Aerostar | 200 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 283 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2766 mm |