1996 Ford Contour vs. 1967 Mini MK I
To start off, 1996 Ford Contour is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,989 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Contour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Contour (129 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Contour should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Contour weights approximately 627 kg more than 1967 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Contour (180 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Contour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Contour | 1967 Mini MK I | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Contour | MK I |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1989 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1242 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2040 mm |