1996 Ford Crown Victoria vs. 1964 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Ford Crown Victoria is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Crown Victoria is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Crown Victoria (179 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1964 Triumph 2000. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Crown Victoria should accelerate faster than 1964 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Crown Victoria weights approximately 660 kg more than 1964 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Crown Victoria | 1964 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Crown Victoria | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 90.2 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5400 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2920 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 64 L |
