1996 Ford Crown Victoria vs. 2000 Seat Arosa

To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Crown Victoria. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Crown Victoria would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Crown Victoria is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Crown Victoria (179 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2000 Seat Arosa. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Crown Victoria should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Crown Victoria weights approximately 541 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Ford Crown Victoria is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Crown Victoria. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Ford Crown Victoria has automatic transmission and 2000 Seat Arosa has manual transmission. 2000 Seat Arosa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Crown Victoria will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: