1996 Ford Escort vs. 1979 Volvo 66
To start off, 1996 Ford Escort is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,988 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Escort is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Escort (131 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Escort should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 66.
Because 1979 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Escort, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Escort (172 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Escort will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Escort | 1979 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Escort | 66 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1988 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84.8 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |