1996 Ford Falcon vs. 1970 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1996 Ford Falcon is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 3,707 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Falcon (228 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Falcon weights approximately 830 kg more than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Falcon (398 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph Spitfire. (99 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Falcon | 1970 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Falcon | Spitfire |
Year Released | 1996 | 1970 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3707 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 398 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1580 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2110 mm |