1996 Ford Falcon vs. 2005 Mazda Tribute

To start off, 2005 Mazda Tribute is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,707 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Falcon (228 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (154 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Falcon weights approximately 101 kg more than 2005 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Falcon (398 Nm) has 191 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Tribute. (207 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Tribute. 2005 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1996 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1996 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Ford Falcon 2005 Mazda Tribute
Make Ford Mazda
Model Falcon Tribute
Year Released 1996 2005
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3707 cc 2262 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 228 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 398 Nm 207 Nm
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1580 kg 1479 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2630 mm