1996 Ford Fiesta vs. 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk
To start off, 1996 Ford Fiesta is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk would be higher. At 3,041 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk weights approximately 5 kg more than 1996 Ford Fiesta.
Because 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Fiesta | 1959 Studebaker Silver Hawk | |
Make | Ford | Studebaker |
Model | Fiesta | Silver Hawk |
Year Released | 1996 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3041 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1350 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |