1996 Ford Fiesta vs. 1983 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1996 Ford Fiesta is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 315 kg more than 1996 Ford Fiesta.
Because 1983 Jaguar XJS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Jaguar XJS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Fiesta | 1983 Jaguar XJS | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Fiesta | XJS |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1660 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2600 mm |