1996 Ford Fiesta vs. 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair
To start off, 1996 Ford Fiesta is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair weights approximately 45 kg more than 1996 Ford Fiesta.
Because 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Fiesta | 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Fiesta | Debonair |
Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 111 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1390 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2700 mm |