1996 Ford Fiesta vs. 2002 Opel Omega
To start off, 2002 Opel Omega is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 2,197 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Opel Omega weights approximately 388 kg more than 1996 Ford Fiesta.
Because 2002 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Fiesta | 2002 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Fiesta | Omega |
Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 142 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1733 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 75 L |