1996 Ford Fiesta vs. 2003 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2003 Jaguar XJ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 270 kg more than 1996 Ford Fiesta.
Because 2003 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Fiesta | 2003 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Ford | Jaguar |
Model | Fiesta | XJ |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 294 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1615 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 85 L |