1996 Ford Fiesta vs. 2004 Mazda B2300
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2300 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 21 kg more than 1996 Ford Fiesta.
Because 2004 Mazda B2300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mazda B2300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Fiesta | 2004 Mazda B2300 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Fiesta | B2300 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2261 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 135 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1366 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2840 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 62 L |
