1996 Ford Fiesta vs. 2013 Kia Optima
To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Fiesta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Fiesta would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia Optima weights approximately 109 kg more than 1996 Ford Fiesta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Fiesta | 2013 Kia Optima | |
Make | Ford | Kia |
Model | Fiesta | Optima |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1454 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2795 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |