1996 Ford Galaxy vs. 1984 Lotus Etna

To start off, 1996 Ford Galaxy is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Lotus Etna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Lotus Etna would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1996 Ford Galaxy. (174 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Galaxy.

Because 1984 Lotus Etna is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Lotus Etna. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Lotus Etna (408 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Galaxy. (240 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1984 Lotus Etna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Galaxy. 1996 Ford Galaxy has automatic transmission and 1984 Lotus Etna has manual transmission. 1984 Lotus Etna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Ford Galaxy will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: