1996 Ford Indigo vs. 1989 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Ford Indigo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,935 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Ford Indigo is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Ford Indigo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Indigo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Indigo | 1989 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Indigo | 626 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5935 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 430 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2090 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1010 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2520 mm |