1996 Ford Ka vs. 1948 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,086 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1948 Humber Pullman (100 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1948 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1192 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1948 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ka | 1948 Humber Pullman | |
Make | Ford | Humber |
Model | Ka | Pullman |
Year Released | 1996 | 1948 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 4086 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 6.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3330 mm |