1996 Ford Ka vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Ka weights approximately 488 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ka | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Ford | Simca |
Model | Ka | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 1996 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2250 mm |