1996 Ford Ka vs. 1952 Peugeot 203
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Peugeot 203 weights approximately 196 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka.
Because 1952 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Ka | 1952 Peugeot 203 | |
| Make | Ford | Peugeot |
| Model | Ka | 203 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2790 mm |
