1996 Ford Ka vs. 1958 Lotus 16
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Lotus 16. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Lotus 16 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 1958 Lotus 16 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Lotus 16 (238 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Lotus 16 should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Ka weights approximately 358 kg more than 1958 Lotus 16.
Because 1958 Lotus 16 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Lotus 16. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Ka | 1958 Lotus 16 | |
| Make | Ford | Lotus |
| Model | Ka | 16 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 238 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2260 mm |
