1996 Ford Ka vs. 1967 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Ka (58 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1967 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1967 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 72 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka.
Because 1967 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Ka (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ka | 1967 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Ka | 1500 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2430 mm |