1996 Ford Ka vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Ford Ka is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 418 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ka | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Ka | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2680 mm |