1996 Ford Ka vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Ka weights approximately 198 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica has automatic transmission and 1996 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 1996 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mitsubishi Minica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ka | 2001 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ka | Minica |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2350 mm |