1996 Ford Ka vs. 2004 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 262 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka.
Because 2004 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Ka | 2004 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Ford | Nissan |
| Model | Ka | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
