1996 Ford Ka vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ka would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 1732 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka.
Because 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 has automatic transmission and 1996 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 1996 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Ka | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
| Make | Ford | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ka | 100 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 8998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 2640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3480 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 80 L |
