1996 Ford Ka vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (112 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Renault Megane (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Ka | 2009 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Ka | Megane |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 105 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 193 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 60 L |
