1996 Ford Ka vs. 2010 Honda Civic
To start off, 2010 Honda Civic is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Civic (140 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Civic weights approximately 308 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Civic (173 Nm @ 4300 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Ka. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ka | 2010 Honda Civic | |
Make | Ford | Honda |
Model | Ka | Civic |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 1216 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 50 L |