1996 Ford Ka vs. 2010 Renault Thalia
To start off, 2010 Renault Thalia is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Thalia (74 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Thalia should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Renault Thalia weights approximately 92 kg more than 1996 Ford Ka. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 105 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ka | 2010 Renault Thalia | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Ka | Thalia |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 105 Nm |
Top Speed | 145 km/hour | 167 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 908 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2473 mm |