1996 Ford Ka vs. 2011 Daihatsu Charade
To start off, 2011 Daihatsu Charade is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Ka would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Daihatsu Charade (68 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1996 Ford Ka. (58 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Daihatsu Charade should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Ka (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Daihatsu Charade. (94 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Ka | 2011 Daihatsu Charade | |
Make | Ford | Daihatsu |
Model | Ka | Charade |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 58 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 105 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 3480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 36 L |