1996 Ford Mondeo vs. 1979 Mazda 323
To start off, 1996 Ford Mondeo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 345 kg more than 1979 Mazda 323.
Because 1979 Mazda 323 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Mazda 323. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mondeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Mazda 323 has automatic transmission and 1996 Ford Mondeo has manual transmission. 1996 Ford Mondeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Mazda 323 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mondeo | 1979 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mondeo | 323 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 1415 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1220 kg | 875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2320 mm |