1996 Ford Mondeo vs. 1998 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 1998 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Mondeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Mondeo would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mondeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mondeo (113 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1998 ZAZ Wagon. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mondeo should accelerate faster than 1998 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mondeo weights approximately 577 kg more than 1998 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Mondeo | 1998 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Ford | ZAZ |
| Model | Mondeo | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.6 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1322 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2330 mm |
