1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1956 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 313 more horse power than 1956 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 379 kg more than 1956 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Mustang | 1956 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | Ford | Isuzu |
| Model | Mustang | Minx |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 350 HP | 37 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |
