1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1956 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (143 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1956 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1956 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 180 kg more than 1956 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 1956 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Mustang | Master RR |
Year Released | 1996 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2540 mm |