1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1966 Holden HD
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Holden HD. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Holden HD would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 228 more horse power than 1966 Holden HD. (122 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1966 Holden HD. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 145 kg more than 1966 Holden HD. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Holden HD. (237 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Holden HD.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 1966 Holden HD | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Mustang | HD |
Year Released | 1996 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2930 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 122 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |