1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1967 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 312 more horse power than 1967 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 713 kg more than 1967 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 499 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 1967 Renault Dauphine | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Mustang | Dauphine |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 38 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 57 Nm |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2280 mm |