1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (350 HP) has 269 more horse power than 1972 Mercury Comet. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Mercury Comet. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 121 kg more than 1972 Mercury Comet. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (556 Nm) has 381 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mercury Comet. (175 Nm). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 1972 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | Mustang | Comet |
Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 556 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1224 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2630 mm |