1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1972 Renault 4
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (212 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1972 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1972 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 816 kg more than 1972 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Mustang | 1972 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Mustang | 4 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2410 mm |
