1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 142 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (298 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Mustang | 2000 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3797 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 143 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1248 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |