1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1983 Mazda 929
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,655 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1983 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1983 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 397 kg more than 1983 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (386 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Ford Mustang | 1983 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Mustang | 929 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4655 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 386 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1547 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2620 mm |
