1996 Ford Mustang vs. 1985 Mazda 323
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 4,655 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1985 Mazda 323. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1985 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 697 kg more than 1985 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Mustang (386 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 307 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mazda 323. (79 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Ford Mustang | 1985 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Mustang | 323 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4655 cc | 1070 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 386 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1547 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4620 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2370 mm |